Burkhimer v. Gealy
254 S.E.2d 918
Opinion
Walton Peter BURKHIMER
v.
Don R. GEALY, Individually, et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
W. P. Burkhimer, in pro. per.
Townsend, Todd & Vanderbloemen, for defendants.
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31. 39 N.C.App. 450, 250 S.E.2d 678. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burkhimer v. Gealy, 254 S.E.2d 918 (N.C. 1979).
254 S.E.2d 918 (Burkhimer v. Gealy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strickland v. MICA Information Systems
800 F. Supp. 1320 (M.D. North Carolina, 1992)