Burkhimer v. Gealy
254 S.E.2d 918
This text of 254 S.E.2d 918 (Burkhimer v. Gealy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Burkhimer v. Gealy, 254 S.E.2d 918 (N.C. 1979).
Opinion
Walton Peter BURKHIMER
v.
Don R. GEALY, Individually, et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
W. P. Burkhimer, in pro. per.
Townsend, Todd & Vanderbloemen, for defendants.
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31. 39 N.C.App. 450, 250 S.E.2d 678. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Strickland v. MICA Information Systems
800 F. Supp. 1320 (M.D. North Carolina, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
254 S.E.2d 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burkhimer-v-gealy-nc-1979.