Burkett v. Ashburn

92 S.E. 1050, 107 S.C. 331, 1917 S.C. LEXIS 131
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJune 29, 1917
Docket9701
StatusPublished

This text of 92 S.E. 1050 (Burkett v. Ashburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burkett v. Ashburn, 92 S.E. 1050, 107 S.C. 331, 1917 S.C. LEXIS 131 (S.C. 1917).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This is an appeal from an order.of his Honor, Judge Smith, refusing to give judgment on a counterclaim set out in the answer of defendant to the complaint in the case to *332 which plaintiff failed to reply and allowing plaintiff to reply to the counterclaim after the time allowed by law had expired. This order is not appealable. It was a matter within the Judge’s' discretion, and this Court in no view of the case could render a judgment absolute, and, therefore, the order is not appealable.

The order of Judge Smith was based upon the consideration of evidence before him and involved questions of fact. Blassingame v. Greenville County (May 28, 1917), 106 S. C. 511, 91 S. E. 861.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blassingame v. Greenville County
91 S.E. 861 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 S.E. 1050, 107 S.C. 331, 1917 S.C. LEXIS 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burkett-v-ashburn-sc-1917.