Blassingame v. Greenville County

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Blassingame v. Greenville County

91 S.E. 861, 106 S.C. 511, 1917 S.C. LEXIS 61

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedMarch 16, 1917

Docket9641

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 91 S.E. 861 (Blassingame v. Greenville County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blassingame v. Greenville County, 91 S.E. 861, 106 S.C. 511, 1917 S.C. LEXIS 61 (S.C. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

This appeal is from an order granting a new trial on the ground that the verdict found for plaintiff was insufficient. The order was based upon consideration of the evidence and involved questions of fact. It also appears that this is not a case in which this Court can give judgment absolute upon the.right of the appellant. Therefore the order is not appealable. Doughty v. Railroad Co., 92 S. C. 361, 75 S. E. 553.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

This appeal is from an order granting a new trial on the ground that the verdict found for plaintiff was insufficient. The order was based upon consideration of the evidence and involved questions of fact. It also appears that this is not a case in which this Court can give judgment absolute upon the.right of the appellant. Therefore the order is not appealable. Doughty v. Railroad Co., 92 S. C. 361, 75 S. E. 553.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 S.E. 861, 106 S.C. 511, 1917 S.C. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blassingame-v-greenville-county-sc-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack