Burke v. Thomas J. Fisher & Co.

219 F.2d 767, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 85
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 17, 1955·No. Nos. 12151, 12154·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Anne Burke and River Road Development Corporation appeal from the District Court’s judgment which dismissed their complaint against Leo F. Donovan and Catherine J. Donovan for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate or, alternatively, for damages in the sum of $150,000. Thomas J. Fisher & Company, Inc., the real estate broker with which Burke and River Road had made a deposit of $5,000, appeals from the judgment, which in effect forfeited the deposit, and ordered it divided equally between the Fisher company and the Donovans.1

[768] Although the Fisher company’s cross-claim against the Donovans for a commission of five per cent, amounting to $9,500, was not discussed in the trial court’s opinion2 and was not expressly dealt with in the judgment, Fisher devoted its argument on appeal to the proposition that the cross-claim was improperly dismissed. Doubtless such dismissal is implicit in the judgment, since the court concluded as a matter of law that the sellers had properly declared a forfeiture. It followed, therefore, that the Fisher company was entitled to only $2,500, or one half of the deposit forfeited when the buyer defaulted.

We see no reason to disturb the judgment of the District Court.

Affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burke v. Thomas J. Fisher & Co., 219 F.2d 767, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 85 (D.C. Cir. 1955).

219 F.2d 767 (Burke v. Thomas J. Fisher & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related