Burke v. State

191 S.E. 871, 55 Ga. App. 847, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 522
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burke v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 54 Ga. App. 225
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 11, 1937·No. 26300·Published

Opinion

Bkoyles, C. J.

1. The defendant was convicted in Jenkins County of the offense of possessing whisky. On the trial the court admitted in evidence, over the objection of the defense, a search warrant commanding the sheriff of Jenkins County to search the residence and place of business of the defendant, “located at 1635th district, Jenkins [County], Georgia,” for whisky. The objection made to the admission of the evidence when it was offered wa’s that the search warrant did not sufficiently . describe the premises to be searched. Under the facts of the case the [848]*848court did not err in admitting the evidence. The case of Smoot v. State, 160 Ga. 744 (128 S. E. 909, 41 A. L. R. 1533), cited by counsel for the plaintiff in error, is distinguished by its facts from this case.

Decided June 11, 1937. G. E. Anderson, for plaintiff in error. G. G. Delete Jr., solicitor, contra.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burke v. State, 191 S.E. 871, 55 Ga. App. 847, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 522 (Ga. Ct. App. 1937).

191 S.E. 871 (Burke v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smoot v. State
128 S.E. 909 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)