Burke v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Burke v. State

191 S.E. 871, 55 Ga. App. 847, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 522

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 11, 1937

Docket26300

StatusPublished

This text of 191 S.E. 871 (Burke v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burke v. State, 191 S.E. 871, 55 Ga. App. 847, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 522 (Ga. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Bkoyles, C. J.

1. The defendant was convicted in Jenkins County of the offense of possessing whisky. On the trial the court admitted in evidence, over the objection of the defense, a search warrant commanding the sheriff of Jenkins County to search the residence and place of business of the defendant, “located at 1635th district, Jenkins [County], Georgia,” for whisky. The objection made to the admission of the evidence when it was offered wa’s that the search warrant did not sufficiently . describe the premises to be searched. Under the facts of the case the [848]*848court did not err in admitting the evidence. The case of Smoot v. State, 160 Ga. 744 (128 S. E. 909, 41 A. L. R. 1533), cited by counsel for the plaintiff in error, is distinguished by its facts from this case.

Decided June 11, 1937. G. E. Anderson, for plaintiff in error. G. G. Delete Jr., solicitor, contra.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bkoyles, C. J.

1. The defendant was convicted in Jenkins County of the offense of possessing whisky. On the trial the court admitted in evidence, over the objection of the defense, a search warrant commanding the sheriff of Jenkins County to search the residence and place of business of the defendant, “located at 1635th district, Jenkins [County], Georgia,” for whisky. The objection made to the admission of the evidence when it was offered wa’s that the search warrant did not sufficiently . describe the premises to be searched. Under the facts of the case the [848]*848court did not err in admitting the evidence. The case of Smoot v. State, 160 Ga. 744 (128 S. E. 909, 41 A. L. R. 1533), cited by counsel for the plaintiff in error, is distinguished by its facts from this case.

Decided June 11, 1937. G. E. Anderson, for plaintiff in error. G. G. Delete Jr., solicitor, contra.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 S.E. 871, 55 Ga. App. 847, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burke-v-state-gactapp-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack