Burke v. State
656 So. 2d 633, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7322, 1995 WL 395832
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burke v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 642 So. 2d 677 →
Opinion
The appellant has raised several issues on appeal. We find no merit to any of his arguments except in respect to his contention, conceded by the state, that there is a scrivener’s error on the face of the judgment entered below which reflects that Count II of said judgment is a second degree, rather than a third degree, felony. We order this scrivener’s error corrected. Otherwise, the judgment is affirmed.
AFFIRMED as corrected.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burke v. State, 656 So. 2d 633, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7322, 1995 WL 395832 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
656 So. 2d 633 (Burke v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.