Burke v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Burke v. State

656 So. 2d 633, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7322, 1995 WL 395832

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 7, 1995

DocketNo. 94-2265

StatusPublished

This text of 656 So. 2d 633 (Burke v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burke v. State, 656 So. 2d 633, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7322, 1995 WL 395832 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant has raised several issues on appeal. We find no merit to any of his arguments except in respect to his contention, conceded by the state, that there is a scrivener’s error on the face of the judgment entered below which reflects that Count II of said judgment is a second degree, rather than a third degree, felony. We order this scrivener’s error corrected. Otherwise, the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED as corrected.

PETERSON, C.J., and COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant has raised several issues on appeal. We find no merit to any of his arguments except in respect to his contention, conceded by the state, that there is a scrivener’s error on the face of the judgment entered below which reflects that Count II of said judgment is a second degree, rather than a third degree, felony. We order this scrivener’s error corrected. Otherwise, the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED as corrected.

PETERSON, C.J., and COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

656 So. 2d 633, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7322, 1995 WL 395832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burke-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.