BURISE v. City of Pontiac

777 N.W.2d 151, 485 Mich. 1073
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 29, 2010·No. 138722·Published

Opinion

777 N.W.2d 151 (2010)

Wilhelmena BURISE and Ralph Burise, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CITY OF PONTIAC, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 138722. COA No. 281443.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 29, 2010.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The motion for reconsideration of this Court's September 28, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BURISE v. City of Pontiac, 777 N.W.2d 151, 485 Mich. 1073 (Mich. 2010).

777 N.W.2d 151 (BURISE v. City of Pontiac) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.