BURISE v. City of Pontiac

772 N.W.2d 383, 485 Mich. 894
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 28, 2009·No. 138722·Published

Opinion

772 N.W.2d 383 (2009)

Wilhelmena BURISE and Ralph Bnrise, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CITY OF PONTIAC, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 138722. COA No. 281443.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 28, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BURISE v. City of Pontiac, 772 N.W.2d 383, 485 Mich. 894 (Mich. 2009).

772 N.W.2d 383 (BURISE v. City of Pontiac) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.