BURISE v. City of Pontiac

772 N.W.2d 383, 485 Mich. 894
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 28, 2009
Docket138722
StatusPublished

This text of 772 N.W.2d 383 (BURISE v. City of Pontiac) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BURISE v. City of Pontiac, 772 N.W.2d 383, 485 Mich. 894 (Mich. 2009).

Opinion

772 N.W.2d 383 (2009)

Wilhelmena BURISE and Ralph Bnrise, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CITY OF PONTIAC, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 138722. COA No. 281443.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 28, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
772 N.W.2d 383, 485 Mich. 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burise-v-city-of-pontiac-mich-2009.