Burgess v. Sikes

Fifth Circuit

Burgess v. Sikes

403 F.3d 323, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4487, 2005 WL 600279

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 9, 2005·No. No. 04-30189·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion Dec. 6, 2004, 5 Cir., 2004, 392 F.3d 782)

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit Judges.¹

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. [324] The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion Dec. 6, 2004, 5 Cir., 2004, 392 F.3d 782)

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit Judges.¹

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. [324] The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Burgess v. Sikes, 403 F.3d 323, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4487, 2005 WL 600279 (5th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

403 F.3d 323 (Burgess v. Sikes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related