Burgess v. Eli Lilly & Co.
605 N.E.2d 388, 65 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 3163
This text of 605 N.E.2d 388 (Burgess v. Eli Lilly & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Burgess v. Eli Lilly & Co., 605 N.E.2d 388, 65 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 3163 (Ohio 1993).
Opinion
Certified Question of State Law. This matter is pending before the court on the certification of a state law question from the United States District Court for the Sixth Judicial Circuit. Upon consideration of respondent’s motion for Andrew See to appear pro hac vice,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion to appear pro hac vice be, and the same is hereby, granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
605 N.E.2d 388, 65 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 3163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgess-v-eli-lilly-co-ohio-1993.