Hardy v. VerMeulen

holding that the four-year statute of repose "as applied to bar the claims of medical malpractice plaintiffs who did not know or could not reasonably have known of their injuries, violates the right-to-a-remedy provision of... the Ohio Constitution"

Hoffner v. Johnson

North Dakota Supreme Court, 2003

holding that the four-year statute of repose “as applied to bar the claims of medical malpractice plaintiffs who did not know or could not reasonably have known of their injuries, violates the right-to-a-remedy provision of ... the Ohio Constitution”

Estate of Makos Ex Rel. Makos v. Wisconsin Masons Health Care Fund

Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1997

four-year statute of repose, as applied to medical malpractice claims, violates the right-to-a-remedy provision of the Ohio Constitution

Estate of Makos Ex Rel. Makos v. Wisconsin Masons Health Care Fund

Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1997

four-year statute of repose, as applied to medical malpractice claims, violates the right-to-a-remedy provision of the Ohio Constitution

Sedar v. Knowlton Construction Co.

Ohio Supreme Court, 1990

statute violates right-to-a-remedy provision of Ohio Constitution with respect to plaintiffs who did not know or could not reasonably have known of their injuries

In Re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation

D. Puerto Rico, 1988

Medical malpractice statute violated due process clause because it extinguished plaintiffs’ cause of action before he could reasonably have discovered his injury

Hardy v. VerMeulen

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack