Burgess v. CG TATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
This text of 140 S.E.2d 766 (Burgess v. CG TATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have examined the record and considered each of plaintiff’s assignments of error. We find no error which, in our opinion, affected the verdict. “ ‘Verdicts and judgments are not to be set aside for harmless error or for mere error and no more . . .”’ Collins v. Lamb, 215 N.C. 719, 720, 2 S.E. 2d 863, 864. The burden is on appellant to show not only that there was error in the trial but also that there is a reasonable probability that “the result was materially affected thereby to his hurt.”' Garland v. Penegar, 235 N.C. 517, 519, 70 S.E. 2d 486, 488. We find no reason to disturb the result of the trial.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 S.E.2d 766, 264 N.C. 82, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgess-v-cg-tate-construction-company-nc-1965.