Burgess v. CG TATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

140 S.E.2d 766, 264 N.C. 82, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1120
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 17, 1965·No. 295·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Pek Cuei&m.

We have examined the record and considered each of plaintiff’s assignments of error. We find no error which, in our opinion, affected the verdict. ‘Verdicts and judgments are not to be set aside for harmless error or for mere error and no more . . .”’ Collins v. Lamb, 215 N.C. 719, 720, 2 S.E. 2d 863, 864. The burden is on appellant to show not only that there was error in the trial but also that there is a reasonable probability that “the result was materially affected thereby to his hurt.”' Garland v. Penegar, 235 N.C. 517, 519, 70 S.E. 2d 486, 488. We find no reason to disturb the result of the trial.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burgess v. CG TATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 140 S.E.2d 766, 264 N.C. 82, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1120 (N.C. 1965).

140 S.E.2d 766 (Burgess v. CG TATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Faucette v. 6303 Carmel Road, LLC
775 S.E.2d 316 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2015)
Cain v. Gencor, Inc.
496 S.E.2d 376 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1998)
Hurley v. Miller
440 S.E.2d 286 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1994)
McNabb v. Town of Bryson City
346 S.E.2d 285 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1986)
Beck v. Carolina Power and Light Co.
291 S.E.2d 897 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)
Brown v. Scism
274 S.E.2d 897 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1981)
State v. Alexander
184 S.E.2d 274 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
Spinella v. Pearce
182 S.E.2d 620 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)
Huffines v. Westmoreland
169 S.E.2d 546 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)
Stewart v. Gallimore
144 S.E.2d 862 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)