Burditt v. Western Growers Pension Plan
818 F.2d 698
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 2, 1987·No. No. 86-6170·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm the judgment for the appellees in this ERISA action for the reasons stated in the well-written opinion of the distinguished District Court Judge A. Andrew Hauk. Burditt v. Western Growers Pension Plan, 636 F.Supp. 1491 (C.D.Cal. 1986). We award the appellees their attorney’s fees as prevailing ERISA plan participants or beneficiaries. McConnell v. MEBA Medical & Benefits Plan, 759 F.2d [699]*6991401, 1406 (9th Cir.1985). Appellees shall file their bill of costs under 9th Cir.R. 14.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burditt v. Western Growers Pension Plan, 818 F.2d 698 (9th Cir. 1987).
818 F.2d 698 (Burditt v. Western Growers Pension Plan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reuben McDaniel Joe P. Martin Eileen Herrala Joseph Guenther Henry Moser v. The National Shopmen Pension Fund
889 F.2d 804 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
Burditt v. Western Growers Pension Plan
818 F.2d 698 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)