Burdett-Rowntree Mfg. Co. v. Standard Plunger Elevator Co.

196 F. 43, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 5456
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 13, 1911
DocketNo. 3
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 196 F. 43 (Burdett-Rowntree Mfg. Co. v. Standard Plunger Elevator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burdett-Rowntree Mfg. Co. v. Standard Plunger Elevator Co., 196 F. 43, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 5456 (circtedpa 1911).

Opinion

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

The patent in suit, No. 666,-699, was granted January 29, 1901, for an improvement in electric elevators — not in all electric elevators, however, but only in those that belong to “ * * * the type wherein, when the elevator-hoisting motor is set in operation, it will be automatically arrested when the [44]*44car reaches a predetermined stopping point or landing. * * * ” And not in all automatic electric elevators either, for it is to be noted that the invention obviously does not apply to an elevator that carries persons — either to a passenger elevator, or to a freight elevator carrying its own operator — but solely to an automatic elevator that carries nothing but freight. “Dumb-waiter” is a colloquial name for the class, and to this class the patent must be restricted. Andl it should be noted further that the sole object of the invention is “to provide a signalling system for (such) electric elevators. * * * ”

In a word, instead of a system in which the movement of the car is controlled either from the car itself or from any floor along its path, the patent offers a system in which every such movement is controlled by one person only, and at one place only, namely, by the motor- attendant, and at the motor itself. A convenient name for the system, although the name is not used in the patent, is the phrase “one-point control.” In order to accomplish the object of the patent, three systems of signals are used — the call, the floor-bell, and the door or lamp system.

• The claims insisted upon deal with the call signals in the first group, ■Nos: 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7:

“1. In an automatic elevator, a hoisting mechanism, means for controlling the saíne, said means operating to start the car and to arrest it automatically at any predetermined landing, a push-button for each floor at .which .the car is to stop, a circuit for each push-button, and a signal, actuated by the operation of each push-button, for signifying in advance of the starting of the car the floor at which the car is desired to stop, as and for the purpose set forth.,
“2. In an automatic electric elevator, a hoisting mechanism, means for controlling the same, said means operating to start the car and to arrest it automatically at any predetermined stopping point, a signal corresponding to each floor or landing at which the car is to stop, and arranged to indicate to the hoisting-mechanism attendant in advance of the starting of the car the floor at which the car is‘to stop, a circuit for each signal, and a push-button arranged in each signal circuit, as and for the purpose set forth.
“3. In an automatic electric elevator, a hoisting mechanism, means for .controlling the same, said means operating to start the car and to arrest it automatically at any predetermined stopping point, signals arranged adjacent to the said controlling means to indicate to the attendant the manner pf. control of the hoisting mechanism to cause the car to proceed to any particular floor or landing, a circuit for each signal, and a push-button arranged to each floor or landing, each push-button controlling a signal-circuit, as and for the purpose set forth.”
‘‘5. In an automatic electric elevator, a hoisting mechanism, means for controlling the same, said means operating to start the car and to arrest it automatically at any predetermined landing, a signal corresponding to each landing at which the car is to stop, a push-button arranged at each floor, each pushbutton controlling the circuit of its corresponding signal, whereby the hoisting mechanism attendant may be notified in advance of the operation of said controlling means to send the car to any floor, as and for the purpose set forth.”
, ‘‘-7. In an automatic electric elevator, a hoisting mechanism, means for controlling the same, said means operating to start the car and to arrest it automatically at any predetermined stopping point, a series of ‘Send’ signals and a series of ‘Call’ signals, said ‘Send’ and ‘Call’ signals being arranged in proximity to the controlling means, a circuit for each signal, a push-button arranged at each landing for controlling the circuit of the. ‘Call’ signal corresponding to that floor, and push-buttons arranged to control the circuits of said ‘Send’ signals, as and for the- purpose set forth.” ■

[45]*45The floor-bell signals appear in the second group, Nos. 9, 10, and 11:

“0. In an automatic' electric elevator, a hoisting mechanism, means for coni rolling the same, said means operating to start the ear and to arrest it automatically at any predetermined landing, a signal arranged at each floor, said signals operating reflectively to indicate that the car requires attention at the particular floor at which it is located, a push-button for controlling said signal, said push-button being arranged in convenient relation to the controlling means, as and for the purpose set forth.
“10. In an automatic electric elevator, a hoisting mechanism, means for controlling the same, said means operating to start the car and to arrest it automatically at any predetermined landing, a signal arranged at each floor or binding, circuits for said signals, and a push-button arranged in convenient relation to the controlling means for controlling the circuit of each signal, as and for the purpose set forth.
“11. In an automatic electric elevator, a hoisting mechanism, means for controlling the same, said means operating to start the car and to arrest it automatically at any predetermined landing, a series of signals arranged in convenient relation to the controlling means, means arranged at each landing for controlling the circuits of said signals, in combination with a signal arranged at each landing, circuits for said landing-signals, and means, also arranged in convenient’ relation to the controlling means, for controlling the circuits of said landing-signals, as and for the purpose set forth.”

And the door or lamp signals appear in the third group, Nos. 12, 13, 14, 15, and 17:

“12. In an elevator, a hoisting mechanism, means for controlling the same, said means operating to start the car and to arrest it automatically at any predetermined stopping point, a signal device arranged in convenient relation to said controlling means, a circuit, for said signal device, a switch arranged at each landing of the elevator shaft, each switch adapted to be closed when the elevator shaft or well door is closed, and to be opened when such door is opened, as and for the purpose set forth.
“IS. In an elevator, a hoisting mechanism, means for controlling the same, said means operating to start the car and to arrest the same automatically at any predetermined stopping point, a door at each floor at which the car is to stop, a switch operated by each door, a signal device arranged in convenient relation to said controlling means, said signal device controlled by the door-switches for signaling the motor attendant, in advance of the actuation of said controlling means, whether the doors are opened or closed, as and for the purpose set forth.
“14. In an automatic elevator, a hoisting mechanism, means for controlling tile same, said means operating to start the car and to arrest, it automatically at any predetermined landing, a.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Herthel
104 F.2d 824 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1939)
Acme Motor Shield Corp. v. Roberts Mfg. Co.
288 F. 127 (D. Connecticut, 1923)
Seiberling v. John E. Thropp's Sons Co.
284 F. 746 (Third Circuit, 1922)
Willard v. Union Tool Co.
253 F. 48 (Ninth Circuit, 1918)
Wm. F. Goessling Box Co. v. Gumb
241 F. 674 (Eighth Circuit, 1917)
Gas Machinery Co. v. United Gas Improvement Co.
228 F. 684 (Sixth Circuit, 1915)
Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co. v. Exeter Mach. Works
225 F. 489 (Third Circuit, 1915)
New York Scaffolding Co. v. Whitney
224 F. 452 (Eighth Circuit, 1915)
Railroad Supply Co. v. Hart Steel Co.
222 F. 261 (Seventh Circuit, 1915)
Krell Auto Grand Piano Co. v. Story & Clark Co.
207 F. 946 (Seventh Circuit, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 F. 43, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 5456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burdett-rowntree-mfg-co-v-standard-plunger-elevator-co-circtedpa-1911.