Burbank v. Commissioner

3 B.T.A. 1118, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2489
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedMarch 31, 1926
DocketDocket No. 4406.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 3 B.T.A. 1118 (Burbank v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burbank v. Commissioner, 3 B.T.A. 1118, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2489 (bta 1926).

Opinion

[1119]*1119FINDINGS OF FACT.

The taxpayer is an individual who resides in and owns the Hotel Plaza Building, in San Francisco.

During the taxable year she expended the amount of $9,795.09 in converting three small store rooms on the first floor of her building into a single large room for the use of one Hirschman, a jeweler. The alterations and improvements were not in the nature of repairs and were made in conformity with an agreement with Hirschman that he would lease the room for a term of 10 years at a rental of $750 per month for the first five years, and of not less than $800 per month for the second five years. The exact amount of the rental for the second five years was to be determined by arbitration. Prior to such rearrangement of the space, the three rooms had been rented from month to month for a total return of $525 per month.

The taxpayer expended the amount of $6,860.91 in altering and reconstructing two rooms in her building that previously had been rented by the Plaza Hotel Operating Co. and used, respectively, as a bar-room and as a club-room for men. The changes in these rooms consisted in the removal of the bar-room and club-room fixtures, the construction of an outside opening of the club-room into the street, and the closing of an arched doorway that had previously connected the two rooms. Before these changes were made, the rooms had not produced any revenue for some time. After the changes the barroom was used as a barber shop by the Plaza Hotel Operating Co., and the club-room was used by a milliner.

The deficiency for 19W is $3,701.58. Order will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bee Holding Co. v. Commissioner
1958 T.C. Memo. 195 (U.S. Tax Court, 1958)
Burbank v. Commissioner
3 B.T.A. 1118 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 B.T.A. 1118, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burbank-v-commissioner-bta-1926.