Bunn v. City of Atlanta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Bunn v. City of Atlanta

191 Ga. 48

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bunn v. City of Atlanta. Read the opinion of the Court — 192 Ga. 682 →

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 17, 1940·No. No. 13502·Published

Opinion

Duckworth, Justice.

This ease is an effort to enjoin a criminal prosecution under a city ordinance, and is controlled by the decision of this court in Powell v. Hartsfield, Anthony v. Atlanta, 190 Ga. [49]*49839, 841 (11 S. E. 2d, 33, 197), Ray v. Dalton, ante, 46 (11 S. E. 2d, 193). While the facts are not identical, they are the same in substance and involve the same principles of law.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, P. J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duckworth, Justice.

This ease is an effort to enjoin a criminal prosecution under a city ordinance, and is controlled by the decision of this court in Powell v. Hartsfield, Anthony v. Atlanta, 190 Ga. [49]*49839, 841 (11 S. E. 2d, 33, 197), Ray v. Dalton, ante, 46 (11 S. E. 2d, 193). While the facts are not identical, they are the same in substance and involve the same principles of law.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, P. J., who dissents.

Bunn v. City of Atlanta, 191 Ga. 48 (Ga. 1940).

Pincite

191 Ga. 48 (Bunn v. City of Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related