Bunch v. Danbury Police Dept.

94 F. App'x 10
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedApril 6, 2004
DocketNo. 03-0079
StatusPublished

This text of 94 F. App'x 10 (Bunch v. Danbury Police Dept.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bunch v. Danbury Police Dept., 94 F. App'x 10 (2d Cir. 2004).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

Lee Allen Bunch, Jr. appeals from the judgment entered in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Chatigny, /.), granting summary judgment in favor of the Danbury Police Department and Detective Louis Ramos.1 [11]*11Familiarity is assumed as to the facts, the procedural context, and the specification of appellate issues.

“This Court reviews the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo” and “will affirm the decision only if the record indicates that ‘there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.’” Tenenbaum v. Williams, 193 F.3d 581, 593 (2d Cir.1999) (quoting Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c)).

For substantially the reasons stated by the district court, it properly granted summary judgment.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tenenbaum v. Williams
193 F.3d 581 (Second Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 F. App'x 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bunch-v-danbury-police-dept-ca2-2004.