Bulluck v. Warden

152 A.2d 184, 220 Md. 658
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedSeptember 9, 2001
Docket[P.C. No. 9, September Term, 1959 (Adv.).]
StatusPublished

This text of 152 A.2d 184 (Bulluck v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bulluck v. Warden, 152 A.2d 184, 220 Md. 658 (Md. 2001).

Opinion

220 Md. 658 (1959)
152 A.2d 184

BULLUCK
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[P.C. No. 9, September Term, 1959 (Adv.).]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 9, 1959.

*659 Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

This application for leave to appeal under the Post Conviction Procedure Act, Code (1958 Supp.), Article 27, sections 645A through 645G, is a mere repetition of the points that were raised in the appeals of the petitioner reported as Bulluck v. State, 219 Md. 67. Even in a serious case of this nature — the petitioner having been sentenced to death in each of two separate convictions of rape — it would serve no useful purpose to set out the claims and contentions again as they were fully set forth, considered and determined in the above noted appeals.

It is not one of the purposes of the Post Conviction Procedure Act to grant an additional and fully repetitious appeal. Code (1958 Supp.), Article 27, section 645A.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bulluck v. State
148 A.2d 433 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1959)
Bulluck v. Warden
152 A.2d 184 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 A.2d 184, 220 Md. 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bulluck-v-warden-md-2001.