Bulluck v. Warden

152 A.2d 184, 220 Md. 658
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided June 9, 1959·No. P. C. No. 9·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This application for leave to appeal under the Post Conviction Procedure Act, Code (1958 Supp.), Article 27, sections 645A through 645G, is a mere repetition of the points that were raised in the appeals of the petitioner reported as Bulluck v. State, 219 Md. 67. Even in a serious case of this nature—the petitioner having been sentenced to death in each of two separate convictions of rape—it would serve no useful purpose to set out the claims and contentions again as they were fully set forth, considered and determined in the above noted appeals.

It is not one of the purposes of the Post Conviction Procedure Act to grant an additional and fully repetitious appeal. Code (1958 Supp.), Article 27, section 645A.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bulluck v. Warden, 152 A.2d 184, 220 Md. 658 (Md. 1959).

152 A.2d 184 (Bulluck v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arrington v. State
983 A.2d 1071 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2009)
Bulluck v. Warden
152 A.2d 184 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Bulluck v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
212 A.2d 746 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1965)
Lipscomb v. Warden
171 A.2d 247 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1961)