Bullard Family Farms, LLC v. Charles Russell Paris

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bullard Family Farms, LLC v. Charles Russell Paris

DecidedAugust 8, 2023

DocketA24A0051

StatusPublished

This text of Bullard Family Farms, LLC v. Charles Russell Paris (Bullard Family Farms, LLC v. Charles Russell Paris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bullard Family Farms, LLC v. Charles Russell Paris, (Ga. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ August 08, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A0051. BULLARD FAMILY FARMS, LLC v. CHARLES RUSSELL PARIS.

The plaintiff, Bullard Family Farms, LLC, filed a complaint against Charles Russell Paris, asserting claims for failure to provide lateral support, nuisance, and trespass relating to the building of chicken houses in 2005. Paris answered and counterclaimed for malicious interference with business relations, trespass, and abusive and frivolous litigation. Paris subsequently filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. The trial court granted Paris’s motion and dismissed the complaint. The trial court, however, reserved ruling on Paris’s counterclaims. The plaintiff then filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction. Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1), appeals may generally be taken from “[a]ll final judgments, that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below[.]” When the case remains pending, the losing party is required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), including obtaining a certificate of immediate review. Islamkhan v. Khan, 299 Ga. 548, 551 (2) (787 SE2d 731) (2016). Because the trial court’s order reserved ruling on Paris’s counterclaims, the order was not a final judgment, and the plaintiff was required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures to obtain appellate review at this juncture. See id. at 550 (1); Stump v. Young, 307 Ga. App. 583, 584 (705 SE2d 684) (2011). The plaintiff’s failure to follow the interlocutory appeal procedures deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/08/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ August 08, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A0051. BULLARD FAMILY FARMS, LLC v. CHARLES RUSSELL PARIS.

The plaintiff, Bullard Family Farms, LLC, filed a complaint against Charles Russell Paris, asserting claims for failure to provide lateral support, nuisance, and trespass relating to the building of chicken houses in 2005. Paris answered and counterclaimed for malicious interference with business relations, trespass, and abusive and frivolous litigation. Paris subsequently filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. The trial court granted Paris’s motion and dismissed the complaint. The trial court, however, reserved ruling on Paris’s counterclaims. The plaintiff then filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction. Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1), appeals may generally be taken from “[a]ll final judgments, that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below[.]” When the case remains pending, the losing party is required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), including obtaining a certificate of immediate review. Islamkhan v. Khan, 299 Ga. 548, 551 (2) (787 SE2d 731) (2016). Because the trial court’s order reserved ruling on Paris’s counterclaims, the order was not a final judgment, and the plaintiff was required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures to obtain appellate review at this juncture. See id. at 550 (1); Stump v. Young, 307 Ga. App. 583, 584 (705 SE2d 684) (2011). The plaintiff’s failure to follow the interlocutory appeal procedures deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/08/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Bullard Family Farms, LLC v. Charles Russell Paris, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bullard-family-farms-llc-v-charles-russell-paris-gactapp-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack