Bulk MRO Industrial Supply, Inc. v. Glove King LLC

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois
DecidedAugust 13, 2025
Docket1:24-cv-01231
StatusUnknown

This text of Bulk MRO Industrial Supply, Inc. v. Glove King LLC (Bulk MRO Industrial Supply, Inc. v. Glove King LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bulk MRO Industrial Supply, Inc. v. Glove King LLC, (N.D. Ill. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

BULK MRO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, INC., ) BULK MRO PPE SUPPLY LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:24-cv-01231 ) GLOVE KING LLC, ATLANTIC CAPITAL ) Honorable Joan B. Gottschall LENDING LIMITED, THANH CHI THI ) NGUYEN, and HENRY LEONG, ) ) Defendants. )

BULK MRO’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AGAINST AMERICAN METRO BANK

Plaintiffs, Bulk MRO Industrial Supply, Inc. and Bulk MRO PPE Supply LLC (collectively referred to herein as “Bulk MRO”), through their undersigned counsel, for their Motion for Judgment against American Metro Bank, state as follows: Background 1. On January 5, 2024, Bulk MRO obtained a money judgment against Defendants/Judgment-Debtors Glove King LLC, Atlantic Capital Lending Limited, Thanhchi Thi Nguyen, and Henry Leong in the matter of Bulk MRO Industrial Supply, Inc. and Bulk MRO PPE Supply LLC v. Glove King LLC, et al. (Case No. 1:22-cv-10530-IT), brought in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, in the principal amount of $5,987,520.00, plus prejudgment interest in the amount of $432,295.41, for a total judgment amount of $6,419,815.41, plus post-judgment interest (the “Judgment”). 2. On February 13, 2024, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1963, Bulk MRO registered the Judgment in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, commencing the action entitled Bulk MRO Industrial Supply, Inc. and Bulk MRO PPE Supply LLC v. Glove King LLC, et al. (Case No. 1:24-cv-1231). 3. On or about February 21, 2024, Bulk MRO issued a Citation to Discover Assets [Dkt. 8] to American Metro Bank (“American Metro”), regarding any amounts held by American

Metro belonging to the Defendants (the “Bank Citation”). A true and correct copy of the Bank Citation is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 4. The Bank Citation stated that “creditor believes the bank has property belonging to the debtors listed below” and specifically listed one of the debtors as: Thanhchi Thi Nguyen 9705 Pacific Ct. Burr Ridge, IL 60525

See Bank Citation, Ex. A, at p. 1.

5. The Citation also stated: “You must file the Answer on page 4 telling the Court about all accounts or safety deposit boxes that the debtor may have an ownership interest in or appears as a signatory. You must not transfer (sell, give away or get rid of) any property not exempt from the enforcement of a judgment. This prohibition shall remain in effect until further order of the court or termination of the proceeding. The bank is required to withhold double the unpaid amount listed below[.]”

See Bank Citation, Ex. A, at p. 2 (emphasis added).

6. The Bank Citation also contained a document rider which required American Metro to produce, among other things, “[a]ll statements of account, including cancelled checks, for any and all deposit, checking, or investment accounts or outstanding loans held by Nguyen[.]” Bank Citation, Ex. A, at p. 9 (emphasis added). 7. On February 27, 2024, American Metro tendered an Answer to the Bank Citation identifying three checking accounts: (1) a business checking account in the name of Atlantic Capital Lending Limited (Account ****4023); (2) a business checking account in the name of Glove King LLC (Account ****4358); and (3) a regular checking account in the name of Nguyen (Account ****8242). A true and correct copy of American Metro’s Answer to the Bank Citation is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 8. It appears that American Metro froze the funds in those three accounts identified in

the Answer pursuant to its obligations under the Bank Citation. 9. On September 4, 2024, Henry Leong and Nguyen each tendered Answers to Debtor Citations issued to them. True and correct copies of their Answers to the Debtor Citations are attached hereto as Exhibit C (Leong) and Exhibit D (Nguyen). Leong and Ngueyn each identified themselves as being an account holder of one American Metro Bank checking account. Ex. C, at p. 5; Ex. D, at p. 2. 10. On October 19, 2024, Bulk MRO issued Notices of Citation Examination to Leong and Nguyen, each containing document requests seeking production of bank records, among other things. On November 14, 2024, in response to the examination notice, Nguyen produced bank statements for a fourth American Metro Bank account (Account ****4811), which American

Metro failed to disclose, with the account holder listed as: Satoshi Holdings Co Thanh Chi Thi Nguyen 9705 Pacific Ct. Burr Ridge, IL 60525

A true and correct copy of the February 2024 – December 2024 statements for Account ****4811 are attached hereto as Exhibit E.1

1 As indicated above, the Bank Citation specifically: (i) stated that Bulk MRO believed American Metro was in possession of funds belonging to Nguyen; (ii) instructed American Metro to identify all accounts in which Nguyen had an ownership interest; and (iii) contained a document rider seeking bank statements for any and all deposit or checking accounts held by Nguyen. American Metro was clearly obligated (but failed) to identify and disclose the existence of the account, freeze the funds, and produce bank statements along with its Citation response in February 2024. 11. On November 19, 2024, Bulk MRO conducted Leong’s citation examination, during which he testified that the newly disclosed account was a personal account for Leong and Nguyen and that Satoshi Holdings Co was a d/b/a for them individually. See excerpt from Leong deposition transcript, attached hereto as Exhibit F.

12. On November 19, 2024, Bulk MRO filed a Motion for Turnover Order [Dkt. 50] which sought, among other things, a turnover of the funds from the newly disclosed American Metro account held by Nguyen in partial satisfaction of the Judgment. 13. On December 13, 2024, the Court entered a Turnover Order [Dkt. 56] granting a turnover of the account, which Bulk MRO circulated to American Metro. 14. On January 6, 2025, Bulk MRO requested that American Metro provide monthly statements for the account, which revealed that Leong and Nguyen were able to transfer $309,464.05 out of the account in December 2024, and that a total of $455,990.57 was transferred, withdrawn, or debited from of the account since the Bank Citation was served on American Metro in February 2024. See March 2024-December 2024 statements for Account ****4811, Ex. E.

15. These monthly withdrawals/debits are broken down as follows: • In March 2024, Withdrawals/Debits totaled $47,845.80 • In April 2024, Withdrawals/Debits totaled $46,936.25 • In May 2024, Withdrawals/Debits totaled $17,666.29 • In June 2024, Withdrawals/Debits totaled $4,013.71 • In July 2024, Withdrawals/Debits totaled $6,925.17 • In August 2024, Withdrawals/Debits totaled $5,041.27

• In September 2024, Withdrawals/Debits totaled $3,165.36 • In October 2024, Withdrawals/Debits totaled $11,751.47 • In November 2024, Withdrawals/Debits totaled $6,612.95

• In December 2024, Withdrawals/Debits totaled $309,464.052 Ex. E. 16. Accordingly, as a direct result of American Metro’s failure to identify and freeze the account in February 2024, Leong and Nguyen were able to use the account freely throughout this 10-month period, making hundreds, if not thousands of debit card transactions, as well as large transfers to and from the account. All of those funds should have been frozen so that Bulk MRO could request a turnover order in partial satisfaction of the Judgment. 17. Furthermore, the Bank Citation required American Metro to produce monthly bank statements, which would have provided critical information about the sources of Debtors’ funds and the location of additional accounts or other assets. 18. For example, the December 2024 statement showed the following sequence of wire transfer activity:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nereida Mendez v. Republic Bank
725 F.3d 651 (Seventh Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bulk MRO Industrial Supply, Inc. v. Glove King LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bulk-mro-industrial-supply-inc-v-glove-king-llc-ilnd-2025.