FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 125

Registration of judgments for enforcement in other districts

28 U.S.C. § 1963
Title28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter125 — PENDING ACTIONS AND JUDGMENTS

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1963 (Registration of judgments for enforcement in other districts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1963.

Text

A judgment in an action for the recovery of money or property entered in any court of appeals, district court, bankruptcy court, or in the Court of International Trade may be registered by filing a certified copy of the judgment in any other district or, with respect to the Court of International Trade, in any judicial district, when the judgment has become final by appeal or expiration of the time for appeal or when ordered by the court that entered the judgment for good cause shown. Such a judgment entered in favor of the United States may be so registered any time after judgment is entered. A judgment so registered shall have the same effect as a judgment of the district court of the district where registered and may be enforced in like manner. A certified copy of the satisfaction of an

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harper MacLeod Solicitors v. Keaty & Keaty, Doing Business as Keaty Law Firm
260 F.3d 389 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
48 case citations
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.
847 F. Supp. 2d 843 (E.D. Virginia, 2012)
15 case citations
Tilcon Capaldi, Inc. v. Feldman
249 F.3d 54 (First Circuit, 2001)
15 case citations
On Track Transportation, Inc. v. Lakeside Warehouse & Trucking Inc.
245 F.R.D. 213 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2007)
11 case citations
ITT Industrial Credit Co. v. Lawco Energy, Inc.
86 F.R.D. 708 (S.D. West Virginia, 1980)
7 case citations
International Wood Processors v. Power Dry, Inc.
102 F.R.D. 212 (D. South Carolina, 1984)
7 case citations
Goldsmith v. Midwest Energy Co.
90 F.R.D. 249 (N.D. Ohio, 1980)
5 case citations
Canizaro Trigiani Architects v. Crowe
815 So. 2d 386 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2002)
4 case citations
Fleming, Zulack & Williamson, LLP v. Information Super Station, LLC
215 F.R.D. 5 (District of Columbia, 2003)
3 case citations
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Panelfab Intern. Corp.
501 So. 2d 167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
3 case citations
Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda Ltd.
544 F.3d 78 (Second Circuit, 2008)
3 case citations
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Aaronian
93 F.3d 636 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
2 case citations
Fox Painting Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
797 F. Supp. 577 (E.D. Kentucky, 1992)
1 case citations
Findley v. Blinken
71 F.3d 1319 (Seventh Circuit, 1995)
1 case citations
Mu-Petco Shipping Co. v. Divesco, Inc.
101 F.R.D. 753 (S.D. Mississippi, 1984)
1 case citations
Popa v. PSP Group LLC
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
In Re E. & So. Districts Asbestos Litigation
800 F. Supp. 643 (C.D. Illinois, 1992)
Leato v. Horizon Bank
(W.D. Arkansas, 2019)

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 958; Aug. 23, 1954, ch. 837, 68 Stat. 772; Pub. L. 85–508, §12(o), July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 349; Pub. L. 100–702, title X, §1002(a), (b)(1), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4664; Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXVI, §3628, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4965; Pub. L. 104–317, title II, §203(a), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3849.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
This section follows the recommendation of the Supreme Court's Advisory Committee on Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1937) which included the following rule:
"Rule 77. Registration of judgments in other district courts. A judgment entered in any district court and which has become final through expiration of the time for appeal or by mandate on appeal may be registered in any other district court by filing therein an authenticated copy of the judgment. When so registered the judgment shall have the same effect and like proceedings for its enforcement may be taken thereon in the court in which it is registered as if the judgment had been originally entered by that court. If in the court in which the judgment was originally entered, the judgment has been satisfied in whole or in part or if an order has been made modifying or vacating it or affecting or suspending its operation, the party procuring the registration shall and any other party may file authenticated copies of the satisfaction or order with the court in which the judgment is registered. This rule shall not be construed to limit the effect of the Act of February 20, 1905, c. 592, §20 (33 Stat. 729), as amended, U.S.C., title 15, §100; or the Act of March 4, 1909, c. 320, §§36 and 37 (35 Stat. 1084), U.S.C., title 17, §§36 and 37; or §56 of the Judicial Code, U.S.C., title 28, §117; or to authorize the registration elsewhere of an order or a judgment rendered in a divorce action in the District of Columbia."
Section 2508 of this title provides for the registration of judgments of the Court of Claims in favor of the United States in any district. See, also, section 2413 of this title.
The phrase "for the recovery of money or property" was not in the committee's draft of Rule 77 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure but was inserted in the revised section to exclude judgments in divorce actions, and any other actions, the registration of which would serve no useful purpose.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1996—Pub. L. 104–317 in section catchline substituted "for enforcement in other districts" for "of the district courts and the Court of International Trade", in first undesignated par. substituted "court of appeals, district court, bankruptcy court," for "district court" and "copy of the judgment" for "copy of such judgment", and added undesignated par. at end.
1990—Pub. L. 101–647 inserted after first sentence "Such a judgment entered in favor of the United States may be so registered any time after judgment is entered."
1988—Pub. L. 100–702 substituted "Registration of judgments of the district courts and the Court of International Trade" for "Registration in other districts" in section catchline and amended first sentence generally. Prior to amendment, first sentence read as follows: "A judgment in an action for the recovery of money or property now or hereafter entered in any district court which has become final by appeal or expiration of time for appeal may be registered in any other district by filing therein a certified copy of such judgment."
1958—Pub. L. 85–508 struck out provisions which extended provisions of section to District Court for Territory of Alaska. See section 81A of this title which establishes a United States District Court for the State of Alaska.
1954—Act Aug. 23, 1954, extended provisions of section to District Court for Territory of Alaska.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1990 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 101–647 effective 180 days after Nov. 29, 1990, see section 3631 of Pub. L. 101–647, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3001 of this title.

Effective Date of 1988 Amendment
Pub. L. 100–702, title X, §1002(c), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4665, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section and repealing section 1963A of this title] take effect 90 days after the date of enactment of this title [Nov. 19, 1988]."

Effective Date of 1958 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 85–508 effective Jan. 3, 1959, on admission of Alaska into the Union pursuant to Proc. No. 3269, Jan. 3, 1959, 24 F.R. 81, 73 Stat. c16, as required by sections 1 and 8(c) of Pub. L. 85–508, see notes set out under section 81A of this title and preceding section 21 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1963.