Bula Miller v. Otis Allen

443 F.2d 1178, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9531
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 16, 1971
Docket30328_1
StatusPublished

This text of 443 F.2d 1178 (Bula Miller v. Otis Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bula Miller v. Otis Allen, 443 F.2d 1178, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9531 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

The motion of the defendant-appellees to dismiss the appeal is denied.

The judgment of the district court is vacated, 1 and the case is remanded to the *1179 district court with directions that no minority-to-minority transfer provision be allowed in the school integration plan to be implemented by the defendant LeFlore County School District for the 1971-72 school year and subsequent years.

The district court is directed to act immediately to implement the formation of a bi-racial committee of citizens in LeFlore County to advise with the LeFlore County School District and with the Court.

The district court shall require the LeFlore County School District to file semi-annual reports during the school year similar to those required in United States v. Hinds County School Board, 5 Cir. 1971, 433 F.2d 611, 618-619.

Vacated and remanded.

1

. Under the stringent requirements of Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, 396 U.S. 19, 90 S.Ct. 29, 24 L.Ed.2d 19 (1969), which this Court has carried out in United States v. Hinds County School Board, 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F.2d 852, and of Carter v. West Feliciana Parish School Board, 396 U.S. 290, 90 S.Ct. 608, 24 L.Ed.2d 477 (1970), implemented in Singleton v. Jackson Municipal Separate School District, 5 Cir. 1970, 419 F.2d 1211, this Court has judicially determined that the ordinary procedures for appellate review in school desegregation cases have to be suitably adopted to assure that each system whose case is before us “begin immediately to operate as unitary school systems”. Upon consideration of the parties’ memoranda *1179 and so much of the record as is available or determined to be needed by the Court, the Court has proceeded to dispose of this case as an extraordinary matter. Rule 2, F.R.A.P.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education
396 U.S. 19 (Supreme Court, 1969)
Carter v. West Feliciana Parish School Board
396 U.S. 290 (Supreme Court, 1970)
United States v. Hinds County School Board, (Civil Action No. 4075(j)) Buford A. Lee v. United States v. Milton Evans, Third-Partydefendant-Appellee. (Civil Action No. 2034(h)) United States of America v. Kemper County School Board, (Civil Action No. 1373(e)) United States of America v. North Pike County Consolidated School District, (Civil Action No. 3807(j)) United States of America v. Natchez Special Municipal Separate School District, (Civil Action No. 1120(w)) United States of America v. Marion County School District, (Civil Action No. 2178(h)) Joan Anderson, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. The Canton Municipal School District and the Madison County Schooldistrict, (Civil Action No. 3700(j)) United States of America v. South Pike County Consolidated School District, (Civil Action No. 3984(j)) Beatrice Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, (Civil Action No. 3779(j)) Roy Lee Harris v. The Yazoo County Board of Education, (Civil Action No. 1209(w)) John Barnhardt v. Meridian Separate School District, (Civil Action No. 1300(e)) United States of America v. Neshoba County School District, (Civil Action No. 1396(e)) United States of America v. Noxubee County School District, (Civil Action No. 1372(e)) United States of America v. Lauderdale County School District, (Civil Action No. 1367(e)) Dian Hudson, United States of America,plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Leake County School Board, (Civil Action No. 3382(j)) United States of America v. Columbia Municipal Separate School, (Civil Action No. 2199(h)) United States of America v. Amite County School District, (Civil Action No. 3983(j)) United States of America v. Covington County School District, (Civil Action No. 2148(h)) United States of America v. Lawrence County School District, (Civil Action No. 2216(h)) Jeremiah Blackwell, Jr. v. Issaquena County Board of Education, (Civil Action No. 1096(w)) United States of America v. Wilkinson County School District, (Civil Action No. 1160(w)) Charles Killingsworth v. The Enterprise Consolidated School District and Quitman Consolidated Schooldistrict, (Civil Action No. 1302(e)) United States of America v. Lincoln County School District, (Civil Action No. 4294(j)) United States of America v. Philadelphia Municipal Separate School District, (Civil Action No. 1368(e)) United States of America v. Franklin County School District, (Civil Action No. 4256(j))
417 F.2d 852 (Third Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Hinds County School Board
433 F.2d 611 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
443 F.2d 1178, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bula-miller-v-otis-allen-ca5-1971.