Buice v. Buice
36 S.E. 969, 111 Ga. 887, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 893
Opinion
The evidence in the case was conflicting, and in no sense demanded the verdict which was rendered. The trial judge did not, therefore, in sustaining the certiorari, abuse the discretion with which he is invested, the result being the grant of a first new trial. Savannah R. Co. v. Fennell, 100 Ga. 477; Williams v. Georgia R. Co., 103 Ga. 575 ; Mitchell v. Braswell, 105 Ga. 502; Weinkle v. Brunswick R. Co., 107 Ga. 367; Crapp v. Morris, 108 Ga. 793.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Buice v. Buice, 36 S.E. 969, 111 Ga. 887, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 893 (Ga. 1900).
36 S.E. 969 (Buice v. Buice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thompson v. Lawrence
121 S.E. 255 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Parker v. Bridges
95 S.E. 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Anderson v. Sheffield
77 S.E. 810 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Weathersby v. Jordan
52 S.E. 83 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)