Buice v. Buice
This text of 36 S.E. 969 (Buice v. Buice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence in the case was conflicting, and in no sense demanded the verdict which was rendered. The trial judge did not, therefore, in sustaining the certiorari, abuse the discretion with which he is invested, the result being the grant of a first new trial. Savannah R. Co. v. Fennell, 100 Ga. 477; Williams v. Georgia R. Co., 103 Ga. 575 ; Mitchell v. Braswell, 105 Ga. 502; Weinkle v. Brunswick R. Co., 107 Ga. 367; Crapp v. Morris, 108 Ga. 793.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 S.E. 969, 111 Ga. 887, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buice-v-buice-ga-1900.