Buice v. Buice

36 S.E. 969, 111 Ga. 887, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 893
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 9, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 36 S.E. 969 (Buice v. Buice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buice v. Buice, 36 S.E. 969, 111 Ga. 887, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 893 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

Little, J.

The evidence in the case was conflicting, and in no sense demanded the verdict which was rendered. The trial judge did not, therefore, in sustaining the certiorari, abuse the discretion with which he is invested, the result being the grant of a first new trial. Savannah R. Co. v. Fennell, 100 Ga. 477; Williams v. Georgia R. Co., 103 Ga. 575 ; Mitchell v. Braswell, 105 Ga. 502; Weinkle v. Brunswick R. Co., 107 Ga. 367; Crapp v. Morris, 108 Ga. 793.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. Lawrence
121 S.E. 255 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Parker v. Bridges
95 S.E. 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Anderson v. Sheffield
77 S.E. 810 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Weathersby v. Jordan
52 S.E. 83 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 S.E. 969, 111 Ga. 887, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buice-v-buice-ga-1900.