Anderson v. Sheffield

Supreme Court of Georgia

Anderson v. Sheffield

77 S.E. 810, 139 Ga. 603, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 539

DecidedMarch 11, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 77 S.E. 810 (Anderson v. Sheffield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Sheffield, 77 S.E. 810, 139 Ga. 603, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 539 (Ga. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

The evidence introduced before the ordinary, on the hearing of a writ of habeas corpus brought for the purpose of determining the custody of a minor child, was conflicting; and there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the judge of the superior court in sustaining a writ of certiorari to the judgment of the ordinary, and remanding the case for another trial. Buice v. Buice, 111 Ga. 887 (36 S. E. 969).

Judgment affirmed.

Beck, J., absent. The other Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lumpkin, J.

The evidence introduced before the ordinary, on the hearing of a writ of habeas corpus brought for the purpose of determining the custody of a minor child, was conflicting; and there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the judge of the superior court in sustaining a writ of certiorari to the judgment of the ordinary, and remanding the case for another trial. Buice v. Buice, 111 Ga. 887 (36 S. E. 969).

Judgment affirmed.

Beck, J., absent. The other Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 S.E. 810, 139 Ga. 603, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-sheffield-ga-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack