Anderson v. Sheffield
77 S.E. 810, 139 Ga. 603, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 539
Opinion
The evidence introduced before the ordinary, on the hearing of a writ of habeas corpus brought for the purpose of determining the custody of a minor child, was conflicting; and there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the judge of the superior court in sustaining a writ of certiorari to the judgment of the ordinary, and remanding the case for another trial. Buice v. Buice, 111 Ga. 887 (36 S. E. 969).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. Sheffield, 77 S.E. 810, 139 Ga. 603, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 539 (Ga. 1913).
77 S.E. 810 (Anderson v. Sheffield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Buice v. Buice
36 S.E. 969 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)