Buford Waldroff v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Buford Waldroff v. United States

341 F.2d 378, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6687

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 2, 1965·No. 21619·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of possessing, ^selling, and transporting non-tax-paid 'whiskey. He admitted the acts in question and relied on the defense of entrapment. This defense was submitted to the jury as a fact issue, and this necessarily included all questions relative to inducement and predisposition. The submis-sion was proper under the evidence adduced, and there the matter ended. Ha-gans v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 315 F.2d 67, cert, den., 375 U.S. 826, 84 S.Ct. 68,11 L.Ed.2d 58.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of possessing, ^selling, and transporting non-tax-paid 'whiskey. He admitted the acts in question and relied on the defense of entrapment. This defense was submitted to the jury as a fact issue, and this necessarily included all questions relative to inducement and predisposition. The submis-sion was proper under the evidence adduced, and there the matter ended. Ha-gans v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 315 F.2d 67, cert, den., 375 U.S. 826, 84 S.Ct. 68,11 L.Ed.2d 58.

Affirmed.

Buford Waldroff v. United States, 341 F.2d 378, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6687 (5th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

341 F.2d 378 (Buford Waldroff v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related