Buford Waldroff v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Buford Waldroff v. United States

341 F.2d 378, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6687

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 2, 1965

Docket21619

StatusPublished

This text of 341 F.2d 378 (Buford Waldroff v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buford Waldroff v. United States, 341 F.2d 378, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6687 (5th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of possessing, ^selling, and transporting non-tax-paid 'whiskey. He admitted the acts in question and relied on the defense of entrapment. This defense was submitted to the jury as a fact issue, and this necessarily included all questions relative to inducement and predisposition. The submis-sion was proper under the evidence adduced, and there the matter ended. Ha-gans v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 315 F.2d 67, cert, den., 375 U.S. 826, 84 S.Ct. 68,11 L.Ed.2d 58.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of possessing, ^selling, and transporting non-tax-paid 'whiskey. He admitted the acts in question and relied on the defense of entrapment. This defense was submitted to the jury as a fact issue, and this necessarily included all questions relative to inducement and predisposition. The submis-sion was proper under the evidence adduced, and there the matter ended. Ha-gans v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 315 F.2d 67, cert, den., 375 U.S. 826, 84 S.Ct. 68,11 L.Ed.2d 58.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

341 F.2d 378, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buford-waldroff-v-united-states-ca5-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack