Home/Supreme Court/Toulmin v. Rike-Kumler Co.

Toulmin v. Rike-Kumler Co.

375 U.S. 825, 84 S. Ct. 66, 11 L. Ed. 2d 58, 139 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 566, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2560
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 14, 1963
DocketNo. 252
StatusPublished
Cited by35 cases

This text of 375 U.S. 825 (Toulmin v. Rike-Kumler Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toulmin v. Rike-Kumler Co., 375 U.S. 825, 84 S. Ct. 66, 11 L. Ed. 2d 58, 139 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 566, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2560 (1963).

Opinion

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Standard Manufacturing Co. v. United States
25 Cl. Ct. 1 (Court of Claims, 1991)
Justus v. State
438 So. 2d 358 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
State v. Thornton
300 N.W.2d 94 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1981)
Edna Bennett Hirst v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
572 F.2d 427 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Charles E. Rose
541 F.2d 750 (Eighth Circuit, 1976)
Joseph W. Johnson, Jr. And Margaret A. Johnson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, H. Clay Evans Johnson and Betty Mead Johnson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, David F. S. Johnson and Elsie E. Johnson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
495 F.2d 1079 (Sixth Circuit, 1974)
Johnson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
495 F.2d 1079 (Sixth Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Dominic Fachini, Jr.
466 F.2d 53 (Sixth Circuit, 1972)
Karen E. McGrath Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Donald v. McGrath Deceased v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad Company
460 F.2d 1312 (Third Circuit, 1972)
Struthers Scientific & International Corporation v. Rappl & Hoenig Co., Inc.
453 F.2d 250 (Second Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Loren Robie Wilson
451 F.2d 209 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
State v. Smith
277 A.2d 481 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1971)
United States ex rel. Gockley v. Myers
314 F. Supp. 839 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1970)
Jackson v. Bergeron
306 F. Supp. 1263 (E.D. Louisiana, 1969)
Sanford Bros. Boats, Inc. v. Dalvis Vidrine
412 F.2d 958 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
Acosta v. Beto
297 F. Supp. 89 (S.D. Texas, 1969)
Donald J. Russo v. United States
391 F.2d 1004 (Ninth Circuit, 1968)
People v. Chimel
439 P.2d 333 (California Supreme Court, 1968)
Demarco v. Edens
390 F.2d 836 (Second Circuit, 1968)
Vincent Demarco, Belle Pomerantz and Mary Roth, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Robert B. Edens, Martin Lasher, Precision Metal Products, Inc., Philip Tashman, Harry Schwartz, John Doe and Richard Roe, the Names John Doe and Richard Roe Being Fictitious, the True Names of Said Being Unknown to the Parties Intended Being More Fully Described in the Complaint, Anthony Grandinetti, Ai Langer, Angela Bennetti, Celia Israel, Stanley F. Harrison, Jr., Harold K. Stearns, and Helen Stearns v. Robert B. Edens, Martin Lasher, Precision Metal Products, Inc., Philip Tashman, Harry Schwartz, John Doe and Richard Roe, the Names John Doe and Richard Roe Being Fictitious, the True Names of Said Being Unknown to the Parties Intended Being More Fully Described in the Complaint
390 F.2d 836 (Second Circuit, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
375 U.S. 825, 84 S. Ct. 66, 11 L. Ed. 2d 58, 139 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 566, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toulmin-v-rike-kumler-co-scotus-1963.