Bufford v. State
852 So. 2d 398, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12376, 2003 WL 21976230
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 20, 2003·No. No. 3D03-551·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the order denying defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence as to the conviction for count two. However, on remand, the sentence for count two shall be corrected to reflect the trial court’s oral prison releasee reoffender adjudication on this count. As to count three, based on the state’s proper concession, we vacate the prison releasee reoffender adjudication on this count, as that conviction is not for an enumerated offense.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bufford v. State, 852 So. 2d 398, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12376, 2003 WL 21976230 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
852 So. 2d 398 (Bufford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davidson v. AAA Cooper Transp.
852 So. 2d 398 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)