BUENO v. OVERMYER

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided October 31, 2019·No. 5:16-cv-04468·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHRISTIAN BUENO : CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 16-4468 MICHAEL OVERMYER, et al.

ORDER AND NOW, this 31‘ day of October 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF Doc. No. 1), Response to the Petition (ECF Doc. No. 28), Judge Lloret’s August 26, 2019 Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. No. 29), Petitioner’s Objections (ECF Doc. No. 33), and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED: 1. Judge Lloret’s comprehensive August 26, 2019 Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. No. 29) is APPROVED; 2. We DENY and DISMISS the Petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF Doc. No. 1) with prejudice; 3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability;' and, 4. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.

' See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUENO v. OVERMYER, (E.D. Pa. 2019).

BUENO v. OVERMYER (BUENO v. OVERMYER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slack v. McDaniel
529 U.S. 473 (Supreme Court, 2000)