Buehler v. Coe & Richmond
5 A. 20, 1 Sadler 10
This text of 5 A. 20 (Buehler v. Coe & Richmond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Buehler v. Coe & Richmond, 5 A. 20, 1 Sadler 10 (Pa. 1885).
Opinion
The recitals in the condition of the bond are fatal to the defense of the plaintiffs in error. They contain clear and express admissions of fact and declarations, which fix the liability of the persons executing the obligation. They became sureties. ’The evidence given or offered was not sufficient to discharge them from the obligation which they assumed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Smith-Stewart v. Kijakazi
N.D. California, 2024
Saechao v. Saul
N.D. California, 2020
David Wachira Ngarurih v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States
371 F.3d 182 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)
Ceres Corporation v. Willie L. Branch Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
96 F.3d 1438 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
CBS, INC. v. Film Corp. of America
545 F. Supp. 1382 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1982)
Fasco, A. G. v. Modernage, Inc.
311 F. Supp. 161 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1970)
Barnes Cycle Co. v. Reed
84 F. 603 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania, 1898)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 A. 20, 1 Sadler 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buehler-v-coe-richmond-pa-1885.