Buehler v. Coe & Richmond

5 A. 20, 1 Sadler 10
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 5, 1885·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The recitals in the condition of the bond are fatal to the defense of the plaintiffs in error. They contain clear and express admissions of fact and declarations, which fix the liability of the persons executing the obligation. They became sureties. ’The evidence given or offered was not sufficient to discharge them from the obligation which they assumed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buehler v. Coe & Richmond, 5 A. 20, 1 Sadler 10 (Pa. 1885).

5 A. 20 (Buehler v. Coe & Richmond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith-Stewart v. Kijakazi
N.D. California, 2024
Saechao v. Saul
N.D. California, 2020
CBS, INC. v. Film Corp. of America
545 F. Supp. 1382 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1982)
Fasco, A. G. v. Modernage, Inc.
311 F. Supp. 161 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1970)
Barnes Cycle Co. v. Reed
84 F. 603 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania, 1898)