Budik v. Brazaitis

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2392

EDITH BUDIK, MD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL P. BRAZAITIS,

Defendant – Appellee,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Movant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (1:09-cv-03079-BEL)

Submitted: August 31, 2010 Decided: October 13, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edith Budik, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Larry David Adams, Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Edith Budik seeks to appeal the district court’s order

granting the motion to substitute the United States as defendant

in this civil action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006);

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Budik seeks to appeal is

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or

collateral order. See Maron v. United States, 126 F.3d 317, 321

n.4 (4th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for

lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED