Home/Supreme Court/BUCK'S STOVE & C. CO. v. AM. FED. OF LABOR

BUCK'S STOVE & C. CO. v. AM. FED. OF LABOR

219 U.S. 581, 31 S. Ct. 472, 55 L. Ed. 345, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 2021
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 20, 1911
Docket190
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 219 U.S. 581 (BUCK'S STOVE & C. CO. v. AM. FED. OF LABOR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BUCK'S STOVE & C. CO. v. AM. FED. OF LABOR, 219 U.S. 581, 31 S. Ct. 472, 55 L. Ed. 345, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 2021 (1911).

Opinion

219 U.S. 581 (1911)

BUCK'S STOVE & RANGE COMPANY
v.
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR.
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR
v.
BUCK'S STOVE & RANGE COMPANY.

Nos. 190, 394.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argument commenced January 27, 1911.
APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Mr. Daniel Davenport and Mr. J.J. Darlington for The Buck's Stove & Range Company.

Mr. Jackson H. Ralston, Mr. F.L. Siddons and Mr. William E. Richardson for The American Federation of Labor et al.

Per Curiam:

When these cases were reached for hearing and after the argument had materially progressed, it developed from statements made by counsel for both parties that the cases had become purely moot because of the settlement between the parties of every material controversy which the record presented. On the disclosure of this situation further argument was dispensed with; and for the reason which led to that action, that is, as we have said, that the controversies between the parties had become in all respects moot, the appeals must be dismissed. Richardson v. McChesney, 218 U.S. 487, 492, and cases cited. Appeals dismissed, without costs to either party. `

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mosler, Inc. v. United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 1862
633 N.E.2d 1193 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1993)
Vardon Golf Co. v. Supreme Golf Sales, Inc.
741 F. Supp. 152 (N.D. Illinois, 1990)
George Clipper v. Takoma Park
898 F.2d 18 (Fourth Circuit, 1989)
Clipper v. Takoma Park
898 F.2d 18 (Fourth Circuit, 1989)
Trans International Airlines, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Etc., Airline Division Teamster Local 2707 Marvin G. Griswold Teamster Local 732, Defendants-Cross-Appellees. Trans International Airlines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division, Teamsters Local 2707, and Air Line Pilots Association, International, Afl-Cio, Defendants- Appellants/cross
650 F.2d 949 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
Trans International Airlines, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
650 F.2d 949 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
General Electric Co. v. Seltzer
161 F. Supp. 200 (D. Delaware, 1958)
United States v. International Union, United Mine Workers of America
190 F.2d 865 (D.C. Circuit, 1951)
Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.
92 F. Supp. 352 (D. Minnesota, 1950)
Waialua Agr. Co., Limited v. Maneja Maneja v. Waialua Agr. Co., Limited
178 F.2d 603 (Ninth Circuit, 1949)
Duell v. Duell
178 F.2d 683 (D.C. Circuit, 1949)
Macklin v. Kaiser Co.
69 F. Supp. 137 (D. Oregon, 1946)
Price v. Wilson
32 A.2d 109 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1943)
Selected Products Corp. v. Humphreys
86 F.2d 821 (Seventh Circuit, 1936)
Western Electric Co. v. Cinema Supplies, Inc.
80 F.2d 111 (Eighth Circuit, 1935)
Farmers' State Bank of Texahoma v. Thompson
261 F. 166 (Fifth Circuit, 1919)
Lisman v. Knickerbocker Trust Co.
211 F. 413 (Sixth Circuit, 1914)
Brown v. Detroit Trust Co.
193 F. 622 (Sixth Circuit, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 U.S. 581, 31 S. Ct. 472, 55 L. Ed. 345, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 2021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bucks-stove-c-co-v-am-fed-of-labor-scotus-1911.