Home/Fifth Circuit/Buckner v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Buckner v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

476 F.2d 1287, 5 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1165, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9893, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8625
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 17, 1973
DocketNo. 72-2697
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 476 F.2d 1287 (Buckner v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buckner v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 476 F.2d 1287, 5 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1165, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9893, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8625 (5th Cir. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the judgment of the district court and adopt its carefully considered and well-written opinion, 339 F.Supp. 1108.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Larkin v. Pullman-Standard Division, Pullman, Inc.
854 F.2d 1549 (Eleventh Circuit, 1988)
William B. Larkin Louise Seals, as Personal Representative of Spurgeon Seals, Deceased Lillie Lofton, as Personal Representative of Edward Lofton, Deceased Jesse B. Terry, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Pullman-Standard Division, Pullman, Inc., a Corporation, Defendant- Louis Swint and Willie James Johnson, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Clyde Humphrey v. Pullman-Standard, Bessemer, Alabama United Steelworkers of America Local 1466 and United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, International Association of MacHinists Louis Swint, and Willie James Johnson, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Clyde Humphrey v. Pullman-Standard, Bessemer, Alabama, United Steelworkers of America Local 1466 and United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, International Association of MacHinists
854 F.2d 1549 (Eleventh Circuit, 1988)
Pravin B. SHAH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HALLIBURTON COMPANY, D/B/A Halliburton Services, Defendant-Appellee
627 F.2d 1055 (Tenth Circuit, 1980)
Burton v. Clarksdale Police Department
488 F. Supp. 88 (N.D. Mississippi, 1980)
Weber v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
563 F.2d 216 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)
Scott v. City of Anniston, Alabama
430 F. Supp. 508 (N.D. Alabama, 1977)
Calvin INGRAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STEVEN ROBERT CORPORATION Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
547 F.2d 1260 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)
Watkins v. Scott Paper Co.
530 F.2d 1159 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
Smith v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY
397 F. Supp. 580 (N.D. Alabama, 1975)
5 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1165, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8625 David Buckner v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
476 F.2d 1287 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
476 F.2d 1287, 5 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1165, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9893, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckner-v-goodyear-tire-rubber-co-ca5-1973.