Buckner v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
476 F.2d 1287, 5 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1165, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9893, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8625
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 17, 1973·No. No. 72-2697·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
We affirm the judgment of the district court and adopt its carefully considered and well-written opinion, 339 F.Supp. 1108.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Buckner v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 476 F.2d 1287, 5 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1165, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9893, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8625 (5th Cir. 1973).
476 F.2d 1287 (Buckner v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Larkin v. Pullman-Standard Division, Pullman, Inc.
854 F.2d 1549 (Eleventh Circuit, 1988)
Pravin B. SHAH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HALLIBURTON COMPANY, D/B/A Halliburton Services, Defendant-Appellee
627 F.2d 1055 (Tenth Circuit, 1980)
Burton v. Clarksdale Police Department
488 F. Supp. 88 (N.D. Mississippi, 1980)
Weber v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
563 F.2d 216 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)
Scott v. City of Anniston, Alabama
430 F. Supp. 508 (N.D. Alabama, 1977)
Calvin INGRAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STEVEN ROBERT CORPORATION Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
547 F.2d 1260 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)
Watkins v. Scott Paper Co.
530 F.2d 1159 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
Smith v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY
397 F. Supp. 580 (N.D. Alabama, 1975)
5 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1165, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8625 David Buckner v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
476 F.2d 1287 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)