Buckley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Buckley v. State

911 So. 2d 819, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12504, 2005 WL 1902712

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 11, 2005·No. No. 1D05-1926·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the circuit court’s order directing the state to file a written response to petitioner’s pending motion for postconviction relief, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot. See Munn v. Florida Parole Commission, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Nonethe[820]*820less, as we did in Munn, we encourage the circuit court to promptly dispose of the pending motion.

BARFIELD, PADOVANO and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the circuit court’s order directing the state to file a written response to petitioner’s pending motion for postconviction relief, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot. See Munn v. Florida Parole Commission, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Nonethe[820]*820less, as we did in Munn, we encourage the circuit court to promptly dispose of the pending motion.

BARFIELD, PADOVANO and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Buckley v. State, 911 So. 2d 819, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12504, 2005 WL 1902712 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

911 So. 2d 819 (Buckley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related