Buckley v. Carlisle

2 Cal. 420
California Supreme Court·Decided October 5, 1852·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Heydenfeldt, Justice.

This was an action for the recovery of personal property. The jury found specially that the plaintiff and defendant were partners in reference to the subject-matter of the suit. The mere statement of the finding is sufficient to show that the plaintiff had no right to recover. The property was as rightfully in the possession of the defendant, as it would have been in the plaintiffs; and there being in the bill no allegation of partnership, and no attempt to seek a dissolution and an account, it follows that there was no relief, to which the plaintiff was entitled; and the judgment is therefore affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buckley v. Carlisle, 2 Cal. 420 (Cal. 1852).

2 Cal. 420 (Buckley v. Carlisle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pueblo v. Verdejo Meléndez
88 P.R. Dec. 207 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1963)
Mosher v. Helfend
44 P.2d 1050 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
De Rigne v. Hart
270 P. 1013 (California Court of Appeal, 1928)
State Ex Rel. Cole v. District Court
254 P. 863 (Montana Supreme Court, 1927)
Balch v. Jones
61 Cal. 234 (California Supreme Court, 1882)
Harris v. Harris
39 N.H. 45 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1859)