Buck Ridge Coal Mining Co. v. Rosoff Engineering Co.

215 A.D. 446
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 5, 1926
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 215 A.D. 446 (Buck Ridge Coal Mining Co. v. Rosoff Engineering Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buck Ridge Coal Mining Co. v. Rosoff Engineering Co., 215 A.D. 446 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in Buck Ridge Coal Mining Co. v. Rosoff E. Co., Appeal No. 1 (215 App. Div. 441), herewith handed down, the order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion of the defendant, respondent, denied, with ten dollars costs, and the plaintiff’s cross-motion for leave to bring in and join Charles H. Welles, Jr., as a party plaintiff granted, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Clarke, P. J., Merrell, Finch, Martin and Burr, JJ.

Ordered reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion of defendant, respondent, denied, with ten dollars costs, and plaintiff’s motion for leave to bring in and join Charles H. Welles, Jr., as a party plaintiff granted, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buck Ridge Coal Mining Co. v. Rosoff Engineering Co.
215 A.D. 441 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 A.D. 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buck-ridge-coal-mining-co-v-rosoff-engineering-co-nyappdiv-1926.