Bubul v. Port Parties, Ltd.

83 A.D.3d 517, 920 N.Y.S.2d 658
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 14, 2011·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sue Anne Hoahng, Special Ref.), entered September 13, 2010, which determined that plaintiff obtained personal jurisdiction over defendant-appellant, and denied appellant’s order to show cause to vacate the default judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Special Referee’s findings that appellant was properly served in this action are substantially supported by the record, and we perceive no basis for disturbing the Referee’s credibility [518]*518determinations (Thomas v Thomas, 21 AD3d 949 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 704 [2006]; Namer v 152-54-56 W. 15th St. Realty Corp., 108 AD2d 705 [1985]). We have considered the remainder of appellant’s arguments and find them unavailing. Concur— Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Catterson, Abdus-Salaam and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bubul v. Port Parties, Ltd., 83 A.D.3d 517, 920 N.Y.S.2d 658 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

83 A.D.3d 517 (Bubul v. Port Parties, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Board of Mgrs. of Graceline Ct. Condominium v. Ansary
2024 NY Slip Op 30027 (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Heywood Condominium Ex Rel. Board of Managers v. Wozencraft
2017 NY Slip Op 257 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Sabotage, Inc. v. Jean Touch, Inc.
99 A.D.3d 487 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)