Board of Mgrs. of Graceline Ct. Condominium v. Ansary

2024 NY Slip Op 30027
New York Supreme Court, New York County·Decided January 5, 2024·Unpublished

Opinion

Board of Mgrs. of Graceline Ct.

Condominium v Ansary

2024 NY Slip Op 30027(U)

January 5, 2024

Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 158992/2021 Judge: Paul A. Goetz

Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.

NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/05/2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY

PRESENT: HON. PAUL A. GOETZ PART 47 Justice

----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------X INDEX NO. 158992/2021 BOARD OF MANAGERS OF GRACELINE COURT MOTION DATE 09/26/2023 CONDOMINIUM,

Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 004 - V -

NADER ANSARY, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF DECISION + ORDER ON

TAXATION AND FINANCE, JOHN DOE #1 THROUGH JOHN DOE #12

MOTION

Defendants.

------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 004) 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT - FORECLOSURE & SALE

Upon the foregoing documents, it is By order dated April 24, 2023 (NYSCEF Doc No 48) this court granted plaintiff's motion to reargue its motion for default judgement, and upon reargument granted a default judgement against all defendants and referred the issue of unpaid common charges and assessments exclusive of attorneys' fees, costs and disbursements to Special Referee Michael J. Roberts, who held a hearing on these issues. On June 12, 2023, the Special Referee issued his report and recommendations and plaintiff now moves to confirm the report pursuant to CPLR § 4403. The Special Referee's findings are substantially supported by the record and there is no basis to disturb his determinations. (Bubul v. Port Parties, 83 AD3d 517 [1st Dep't 2011]). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further

158992/2021 BOARD OF MANAGERS OF GRACELINE COURT CONDOMINIUM vs. NADAR Page 1 of 10 ANSARYETAL Motion No. 004

1 of 10

[* 1]

NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/05/2024

ORDERED that the Referee's Report be, and the same is, hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects; and it is further ORDERED, that the subject condominium unit described in the Verified Complaint and as hereafter described, or such part thereof as may be sufficient to discharge the condominium common charges lien, the expenses of the sale, and the 3 costs of this action as provided by the RP APL be sold, in one parcel, at a public auction on a Wednesday afternoon at 2: 15 p.m. on the Portico of the Supreme Court building, 60 Centre Street, New York, NY, on a date to be set by the Court, by and under the direction of Michael J. Roberts, Esq., 805 Third Avenue, Rm. 2030, New York, New York 10022 (michaelrobertsesq@msn.com) (fiduciary ID 242907) who is hereby appointed Referee for that purpose; and it is further ORDERED that, by accepting this appointment, the Referee certifies that he/she is in compliance with Part 36, including Section 36.2 (d) ("Limitations on appointments based upon compensation"), but if she is disqualified from receiving such appointment pursuant to the provisions of Part 36, she shall notify this court forthwith; and it is further ORDERED that, by accepting this appointment, the Referee certifies that she is familiar with the duties and responsibilities of a Referee to Sell, has experience in such area, and is fully capable of assuming, and prepared to assume, those duties and responsibilities, which are commensurate with her abilities; and it is further ORDERED that attorneys or support staff in the appointee's office may perform tasks under the appointee's direct supervision [unless otherwise directed by the court], but all substantive appearances and reports must be made, performed, and created by the appointee; and it is further

158992/2021 BOARD OF MANAGERS OF GRACELINE COURT CONDOMINIUM vs. NADAR Page 2 of 10 ANSARYETAL Motion No. 004

2 of 10

[* 2]

NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/05/2024

ORDERED that, upon receipt of this order and UCS Form 872 (Notice of Appointment and Certification of Compliance), the Referee shall complete, execute, and return the Form 872 to the Fiduciary Clerk

ORDERED that, if it is anticipated that the referee's fees will exceed $750, the referee must apply [by letter] to the court for approval of such fees and the referee shall comply with Section 36.4 before such fees can be paid; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff is only authorized to pay the referee fees in excess of $750 upon receipt of an order by the court authorizing such payment; and it is further ORDERED that the Referee shall conduct the foreclosure sale only if Plaintiff, its successors and/or assignees, or its representative is present at the sale or the Referee has received a written bid and Terms of Sale from Plaintiff, its successors and/or assigns, or its representative; and it is further

ORDERED that if the Referee does not conduct the sale within 90 days of the date of the judgment, in accordance with CPLR 2004, the time fixed by 4 RP APL § 1351 (1) is extended for the Referee to conduct the sale as soon as reasonably practicable, to a date to be set by the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that at the time of sale the Referee shall accept a written bid from the Plaintiff or the Plaintiffs attorney, just as though Plaintiff were physically present to submit said bid; and it is further

ORDERED that the Referee shall accept the highest bid offered by a bidder who shall be identified upon the court record, and shall require that the successful bidder immediately execute Terms of Sale for the purchase of the property, and pay to the Referee, in cash or certified or bank

158992/2021 BOARD OF MANAGERS OF GRACELINE COURT CONDOMINIUM vs. NADAR Page 3 of 10 ANSARYETAL Motion No. 004

3 of 10

[* 3]

NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/05/2024

check, ten percent ( 10%) of the sum bid, unless the successful bidder is Plaintiff in which case no deposit against the purchase price shall be required; and it is further ORDERED that in the event the first successful bidder fails to execute the Terms of Sale immediately following the bidding upon the subject property or fails to immediately pay the ten percent (10%) deposit as required, then (i) the property shall immediately and on the same day be reoffered at auction; or (ii) the Referee may offer the property to the next highest successful bidders from the original auction; and it is further ORDERED that the sale shall be conducted on the following terms, public notice of which shall be given by the Referee in the New York Law Journal; and it is further ORDERED that promptly after the conclusion of said sale, in accordance with law, the Referee shall file with the Clerk of the Court a report of the sale and all of the Referee's proceedings in connection therewith; and it is further ORDERED that such filing with the Clerk of the Court shall be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Protocol on Courthouse and County Clerk Procedures for Electronically Filed Cases (accessible at the "E-Filing" page on the court's website at the address www.nycourts.gov/supctmanh)]; and it is further ORDERED that the Referee, on receiving the proceeds of such sale, shall forthwith pay therefrom, in accordance with their priority according to law, all taxes, assessments, sewer rents, or water rates, which are, or may become, liens on the property at the time of sale, with such interest or penalties which may have lawfully accrued thereon to the date of payment; and it is further

158992/2021 BOARD OF MANAGERS OF GRACELINE COURT CONDOMINIUM vs. NADAR Page 4 of 10 ANSARYETAL Motion No. 004

4 of 10

[* 4]

NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/05/2024

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Mgrs. of Graceline Ct. Condominium v. Ansary, 2024 NY Slip Op 30027 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2024).

2024 NY Slip Op 30027 (Board of Mgrs. of Graceline Ct. Condominium v. Ansary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bubul v. Port Parties, Ltd.
83 A.D.3d 517 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)