Bryant v. State

931 So. 2d 1031, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9695, 2006 WL 1627853
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bryant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 851 So. 2d 823
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 14, 2006·No. No. 1D05-4523·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

“It has long been the established law of this state that an order denying a motion for rehearing or reconsideration is nonap-pealable and not subject to appellate review.” Carter v. State, 242 So.2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); see Cole v. State, 905 So.2d 905(Fla. 1st DCA. 2005) (“Because the motion for rehearing is not subject.to appellate review, this Court is without appellate jurisdiction.”).

DISMISSED.

KAHN, C.J., ERVIN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryant v. State, 931 So. 2d 1031, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9695, 2006 WL 1627853 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

931 So. 2d 1031 (Bryant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carter v. State
242 So. 2d 737 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Cole v. State
905 So. 2d 905 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)