Bryant v. State

861 So. 2d 114, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19529, 2003 WL 23009903
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bryant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 787 So. 2d 68
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 24, 2003·No. No. 3D02-3366·Published

Opinion

Confession of Error

PER CURIAM.

Charles L. Bryant has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, which requests enforcement of the mandate on remand from Bryant v. State, 793 So.2d 906 (Fla.2001). See Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 18.10, at 282 n. 2 (2003). As the State concedes, defendant-movant Bryant is entitled to a new sentencing hearing in the trial court, with the assistance of counsel. If the trial court again elects to impose a departure sentence, the defendant may challenge the departure reasons on appeal from the new sentencing order, if there is a viable legal basis to do so.

Petition granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryant v. State, 861 So. 2d 114, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19529, 2003 WL 23009903 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

861 So. 2d 114 (Bryant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryant v. State
793 So. 2d 906 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)