Bryant v. State

777 So. 2d 1166, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1341, 2001 WL 121090
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bryant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 744 So. 2d 1225
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 14, 2001·No. No. 3D00-2143·Published

Opinion

On Rehearing Granted

COPE, J.

On consideration of the motion for rehearing, we withdraw the opinion dated November 15, 2000, and substitute the following opinion.

Ernest Bryant appeals an order denying postconviction relief. We affirm in part and reverse in part. Count two of the judgment incorrectly states that defendant-appellant Ernest Bryant entered a no contest plea to the charge of unlawful possession of a firearm or weapon by a violent career criminal. In reality, the defendant pled no contest to the reduced charge of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Count two of the judgment must be corrected accordingly. Defendant need not be present.

Defendant contends that he is entitled to be resentenced. We disagree. The sentencing order accurately reflects the plea bargain. The trial court properly denied this claim, as well as the remainder of defendant’s claims.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for correction of judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryant v. State, 777 So. 2d 1166, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1341, 2001 WL 121090 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

777 So. 2d 1166 (Bryant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.