Bryant v. State

660 So. 2d 395, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9700, 1995 WL 544164
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bryant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 644 So. 2d 513
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 15, 1995·No. No. 95-143·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal1 we vacate appellant’s sentence, and remand for the trial court to resolve a sentencing discrepancy. The written probation order directs that appellant successfully complete any alcohol/drug treatment program or educational courses required by the probation officer, while the trial judge did not orally announce this special condition at sentencing. See Cleveland v. State, 617 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

COBB, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryant v. State, 660 So. 2d 395, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9700, 1995 WL 544164 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

660 So. 2d 395 (Bryant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Cleveland v. State
617 So. 2d 1166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)