Bryant v. State
This text of 486 So. 2d 680 (Bryant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Bryant appeals an order denying post-conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. We affirm.
Bryant’s motion and the files and records in the case conclusively show that Bryant is entitled to no relief. Therefore, the trial court was correct in denying the motion without hearing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.
We treat Bryant’s argument of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel as a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Smith v. State, 400 So.2d 956, 960 (Fla.1981); Fla. R.App.P. 9.040(c). We deny the petition under the principles of Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla.1981).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
486 So. 2d 680, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 847, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.