Bryant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bryant v. State

424 So. 2d 211, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18446

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 5, 1983

DocketNo. 82-696

StatusPublished

This text of 424 So. 2d 211 (Bryant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bryant v. State, 424 So. 2d 211, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18446 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

RYDER, Judge.

The appellant was charged and convicted of grand theft and carrying a concealed weapon, a switchblade. We find no merit in the appellant’s claim that the trial court erred in granting an extension of the speedy trial time. Tucker v. State, 344 So.2d 284 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Therefore, we affirm the judgment and sentence as to the grand theft conviction.

Due to a clerical error, however, the written judgment and probation order concerning the second charge stated that appellant was convicted and sentenced on a charge of carrying a concealed weapon, a firearm. Since the jury found her guilty as charged and the record shows the court adjudicated her guilty as charged, we strike the word “firearm” from the probation order and insert the word “weapon” in its place. We affirm that conviction and order as amended.

OTT, C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RYDER, Judge.

The appellant was charged and convicted of grand theft and carrying a concealed weapon, a switchblade. We find no merit in the appellant’s claim that the trial court erred in granting an extension of the speedy trial time. Tucker v. State, 344 So.2d 284 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Therefore, we affirm the judgment and sentence as to the grand theft conviction.

Due to a clerical error, however, the written judgment and probation order concerning the second charge stated that appellant was convicted and sentenced on a charge of carrying a concealed weapon, a firearm. Since the jury found her guilty as charged and the record shows the court adjudicated her guilty as charged, we strike the word “firearm” from the probation order and insert the word “weapon” in its place. We affirm that conviction and order as amended.

OTT, C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

424 So. 2d 211, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack