Bryant v. Schmoor
This text of 393 So. 2d 41 (Bryant v. Schmoor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order denying the appellant’s motion to set aside the final judgment [see Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.540(b)] entered below is affirmed as no excusable neglect or mistake is shown on this record sufficient to reverse the above trial court ruling, Schwab & Co. v. Breezy Bay, Inc., 360 So.2d 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); see Rinieri v. News Syndicate Co., 385 F.2d 818, 823 (2d Cir.1967); Usery v. Weiner Bros., 70 F.R.D. 615 (D.C.Conn.1976). The appellant’s second contention upon this appeal is rejected on the ground that the appellant failed to raise such contention below in her motion to set aside the final judgment. Mariani v. Schleman, 94 So.2d 829, 831 (Fla.1957).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
393 So. 2d 41, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-schmoor-fladistctapp-1981.