Bryant v. Schmoor

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bryant v. Schmoor

393 So. 2d 41, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19408

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 1981·No. No. 80-1146·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the appellant’s motion to set aside the final judgment [see Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.540(b)] entered below is affirmed as no excusable neglect or mistake is shown on this record sufficient to reverse the above trial court ruling, Schwab & Co. v. Breezy Bay, Inc., 360 So.2d 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); see Rinieri v. News Syndicate Co., 385 F.2d 818, 823 (2d Cir.1967); Usery v. Weiner Bros., 70 F.R.D. 615 (D.C.Conn.1976). The appellant’s second contention upon this appeal is rejected on the ground that the appellant failed to raise such contention below in her motion to set aside the final judgment. Mariani v. Schleman, 94 So.2d 829, 831 (Fla.1957).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the appellant’s motion to set aside the final judgment [see Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.540(b)] entered below is affirmed as no excusable neglect or mistake is shown on this record sufficient to reverse the above trial court ruling, Schwab & Co. v. Breezy Bay, Inc., 360 So.2d 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); see Rinieri v. News Syndicate Co., 385 F.2d 818, 823 (2d Cir.1967); Usery v. Weiner Bros., 70 F.R.D. 615 (D.C.Conn.1976). The appellant’s second contention upon this appeal is rejected on the ground that the appellant failed to raise such contention below in her motion to set aside the final judgment. Mariani v. Schleman, 94 So.2d 829, 831 (Fla.1957).

Affirmed.

Bryant v. Schmoor, 393 So. 2d 41, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19408 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

393 So. 2d 41 (Bryant v. Schmoor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related