Brusster v. Industrial Accident Commission

169 P. 258, 35 Cal. App. 81, 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 390
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 22, 1917
DocketCiv. No. 2280.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 169 P. 258 (Brusster v. Industrial Accident Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brusster v. Industrial Accident Commission, 169 P. 258, 35 Cal. App. 81, 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 390 (Cal. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

THE COURT.

Petition for writ of review.

The applicant, being a night watchman in the employ of the petitioners, received an injury while using a circular saw on the premises of his employers, the use of said saw being occasioned by the desire of said watchman to procure a board of suitable length to barricade an outer door of the premises which he. was employed to watch, the lock on said door being defective. He was awarded compensation by the Industrial Accident Commission, and a writ of review is here sought for the purpose of annulling said award upon the ground that there is no evidence to sustain it.

Assuming that it was within the scope of the applicant’s employment to see that the doors of the premises were properly secured by locking, nevertheless we are of the opinion that-his resort to the use of a circular saw for the purpose of making a board that would answer the purpose of extending across the door was entirely beyond the scope of his employment and not in the contemplation of his employers, and was not a resort to reasonable means for the purpose of securing the end intended by him at that time. If we are correct in this conclusion, the award cannot stand; and it is therefore ordered that it be, and it is hereby, annulled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wallace v. Rex Fuel Co.
250 N.W. 589 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1933)
Enfield v. the Certain-Teed Prod. Co.
233 N.W. 141 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 P. 258, 35 Cal. App. 81, 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brusster-v-industrial-accident-commission-calctapp-1917.