Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Brunson v. State

Brunson v. State

951 So. 2d 980, 2007 WL 750331
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 14, 2007
Docket4D07-324
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 951 So. 2d 980 (Brunson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brunson v. State, 951 So. 2d 980, 2007 WL 750331 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

951 So.2d 980 (2007)

Allangson BRUNSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D07-324.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 14, 2007.

Allangson Brunson, Indiantown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a). We affirm without prejudice to defendant filing a rule 1.540(a) motion to correct a scrivener's error. See Wells v. State, 796 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

POLEN, FARMER and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Averett v. State
10 So. 3d 1135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Cuartas v. Cuartas
951 So. 2d 980 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
951 So. 2d 980, 2007 WL 750331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brunson-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.