Brunson v. State

951 So. 2d 980, 2007 WL 750331
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 14, 2007·No. 4D07-324·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

951 So.2d 980 (2007)

Allangson BRUNSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D07-324.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 14, 2007.

Allangson Brunson, Indiantown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a). We affirm without prejudice to defendant filing a rule 1.540(a) motion to correct a scrivener's error. See Wells v. State, 796 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

POLEN, FARMER and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brunson v. State, 951 So. 2d 980, 2007 WL 750331 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

951 So. 2d 980 (Brunson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Averett v. State
10 So. 3d 1135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Cuartas v. Cuartas
951 So. 2d 980 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)